Select an Author:
Select a Center:
Most Common Tags:
Climate change (39)
Arctic Ocean (25)
Changing Arctic Sea Ice (17)
Ocean and Climate Literacy (9)
ROLE Model Webinar (9)
concept mapping (8)
Ocean Acidification (8)
Alaska Marine Ecosystems (7)
Communicating about Climate Change (7)
Marine Ecosystem Science (7)
07.28.10 webinar (5)
08.10.10 webinar (5)
10.06.10 webinar (5)
Bering Sea (5)
Communicating Science (5)
Culturally-relevant Science Education (5)
carbon cycle (4)
Carbon Cycling (4)
educator post (4)
hydrothermal vents (4)
scientist post (4)
10.20.10 webinar (3)
Alaska K-12 Science Education (3)
Changing Species Distributions (3)
Gray Whale (3)
Herring (3)
icebergs (3)
network (3)
network science (3)
networks (3)
oil spill (3)
Polar Bear (3)
Walrus (3)
02.16.11 webinar (2)
11.03.10 webinar (2)
aerosols (2)
AGU (2)
Alaska Native Perspectives on Climate Change (2)
Changes in Alaska Marine Ecosystems (2)
Changing Ocean Current Patterns (2)
conferences (2)
graduate students (2)
Gulf of Alaska (2)
Humpback Whales (2)
leadership (2)
MSP (2)
Salmon (2)
SEWG (2)
Temperature Patterns (2)
Traditional Knowledge (2)
03.23.11 webinar (1)
09.22.10 webinar (1)
11.17.10 webinar (1)
12.01.10 webinar (1)
Alaska Marine Ecosystem (1)
Alaska Natives (1)
Arctic Ecosystems (1)
Arctic Sea Ice (1)
ASLO (1)
Atlantic Crossing (1)
biological pump (1)
Bowhead Whale (1)
carbon sequestration (1)
case study (1)
Changes in Ocean Current Systems (1)
Changing Alaska Marine Ecosystems (1)
chemical oceanography (1)
Climate Change Impacts on Alaska Marine Ecosystems (1)
Climate Change. Sea Level Rise (1)
climate intervention (1)
collaboration (1)
Collaborative Research (1)
communicating (1)
COSEE New England (1)
COSEE SouthEast (1)
data (1)
Deepwater Horizon (1)
Education and Outreach (1)
EE Week (1)
ENTs (1)
estuaries (1)
Global Climate Change (1)
groups (1)
Gulf of Mexico (1)
Gulf Stream (1)
Hear the Answer (1)
Heat storage in the Ocean (1)
informal science education (1)
Intertidal Community Ecology (1)
iron (1)
K-12 Science Education (1)
King Salmon (1)
Lesson plans (1)
lobsters (1)
Long-term Temperature Patterns (1)
Marine Ecosystems (1)
Methane Hydrates (1)
microbes (1)

Teaming up on the Iceberg Project
11/22/2010 | Benjamin Twining, Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences (Ocean Systems)
Tags: 10.20.10 webinar, scientist post, icebergs

One of my favorite aspects of oceanography is its collaborative nature. Most projects are collaborations between multiple science groups—often located at different institutions and occasionally on different sides of the globe. A great collaborator can teach you about their field of research, provide an independent view of your own data, and help generate novel models and hypotheses.

The Iceberg Project involved 9 principal investigators at 7 different institutions across the country, including Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, UC-San Diego, University of San Diego, Desert Research Institute, University of South Carolina and Brigham Young University, in addition to myself at Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences. Each of these leaders then recruited and hired additional students, post-docs and science staff, so that the whole project involved more than 30 scientists on the research cruise.

The research team on the Nathaniel B. Palmer. (Photo by Debbie Nail Meyer)
The research team on the Nathaniel B. Palmer. (Photo by Debbie Nail Meyer)

While my work was focused on the effects of icebergs on iron in the water, our interest in iron is motivated by its potential to affect the growth of plankton. Thus the response of the biological community to the presence of icebergs was studied at several trophic levels. Starting with the smallest organisms, Alison Murray was responsible for examining the identity and behavior of heterotrophic bacteria around icebergs.

Alison’s group
Micrograph of stained cells. (Ben Twining)
Micrograph of stained cells. (Ben Twining)
collected water from throughout the water column in order to determine the abundance of bacteria. To do this, they used microscopy and flow cytometry. For microscopy, the cells are collected onto a filter and the DNA of the cells is stained with a chemical that fluoresces when excited with a specific type of light. This allows them to count the cells and also determine their size with digital imaging. The Murray group used genetics to determine the identity of the bacteria, and they also measured the activities of various enzymes produced by the bacteria to determine what organic compounds the cells were using to grow.

Some Antarctic diatoms (Adrian Cefarelli - Deep-Sea Research II, in press)
Some Antarctic diatoms (Adrian Cefarelli - Deep-Sea Research II, in press)
Moving up the size scale, the abundance, identity and activity of phytoplankton was studied by Maria Vernet and her group. They measured the concentration of chlorophyll (the most abundant plant pigment) in various size classes to determine relatively quickly what types of cells were present. They also used microscopy to visually identify certain types of diatoms and other groups of interest. In order to determine the rates at which phytoplankton were converting carbon dioxide into cellular material through photosynthesis, the Vernet group incubated water in incubators on the ship and measured the rate of incorporation of C-14, a radioactive isotope of carbon.

Images of fish captured by ROV cameras.
Images of fish captured by ROV cameras. (Sherlock et al., Deep-Sea Research II, in press)
Moving further up the food web, the zooplankton and micronekton (small fish) were studied by Ron Kaufmann and Bruce Robison. In order to obtain animals for counting, identification and further measurements, large nets were towed each night to collect krill, other crustaceans, and gelatinous zooplankton. These samples were sorted every morning by a virtual army of ‘pickers’, and some of the animals were tested for the contents of their guts in order to determine how much they were eating. Additionally, grazing organisms living right at the face of the iceberg were counted and identified in situ (in the water) using the high-definition video capabilities of the remotely-operated vehicle.

Zooplankton sorters, hard at work. (photo by Debbie Nail Meyer)
Zooplankton sorters, hard at work. (photo by Debbie Nail Meyer)

Pulling it all together, biology results indicate that larger phytoplankton (mostly diatoms) were growing at the face of the iceberg, however these cells were also likely getting eaten at a faster rate than cells farther from the iceberg. The growth of these cells may have been stimulated by iron or other nutrients released from the iceberg, but growth may also be enhanced by changes in water column mixing caused by the iceberg. The story is still unfolding as results are added.

<< More from Dr. Mayer on Carbon! Part 2 of 2 Back to Blogs - Home Too Much of a Good Thing: Excess Nutrients in Estuarine Systems >>